"For us, the idea of having a work that has contradictions is very important—when, in affirming something, it includes itself and attacks itself. How can you put together all of these things that have nothing to do with each other? You use glue! Glue can be an idea, a word. You can use an ideological glue."
Can a contemporary work of art function as an icon? Icons, and the ideas that they represent, are often a source of inspiration. Watch Mary Heilmann's segment and discuss the relationship between an artwork and an icon.
Compare the use of icons and iconographic imagery in Heilmann's work to the approaches of other artists, including: Lari Pittman, Allan McCollum, Pierre Huyghe, Jeff Koons, John Feodorov, and Matthew Barney.
What is an icon? Can a contemporary work of art function as an icon? Why or why not? Give specific examples.
Heilmann says, of some of her early paintings: "First they're objects, and then they're pictures of something." What do you think she means by this?
What are the sources of inspiration for Heilmann's work? How do different sources come together in her paintings, ceramics, and slideshows?
Make two paintings, using two different approaches. First, create an abstract image, and title it after you are finished. Second, create a title, and then create an abstract image. How do the two works differ, in their processes and in the finished works?